The
Other Side of Jesus...
Addresses
the Other Side of the Church
John 2:13-22[1]
There
used to be one of those God billboards between here and Greensboro. I haven’t seen it lately so maybe they took
it down. It said, “Don’t make me come
down there! – God.” Most of us have
seen a number of these billboards but they are just a little too cheesy and
small-minded for me. I don’t like them
much. I think they sell one-dimensional
images of God that have some pretty shallow theology. Anyway, I especially didn’t like the one between here and
Greensboro. Images of an angry God are
unsettling. While our perceptions of
God must not exclude images that reveal God’s displeasure with sinful humanity,
too many people never get beyond an image of God who’s out to get us. But these billboards do cause us to stop and
think, don’t they?
Take
for a moment the Jesus we meet in our text today. Of all the images we embrace for Jesus, the Jesus we encounter in
our text today makes us squirm a little.
This account of Jesus’ aggressive behavior doesn’t mesh too well with
our cherished views of Jesus as teacher, healer, comforter, and gentle
shepherd. When we think of this story, most of us will soften it in our
minds. We are prone to think that
surely Jesus didn’t swing the whip too hard after he made it. And even if he did whip it around
forcefully, he certainly didn’t hit anyone with it.[2]
We
have a lot of hymns in our hymnbook that tout Christ as the Gentle Shepherd,
but not too many that talk about Jesus tearing up the place. When we think about the crucifixion of
Christ, we admire his strength of character by dutifully accepting the cross so
that we might have eternal life. We
cherish the fact that when they spit in his face and beat him he didn’t
retaliate. But here in our text today,
we don’t have the soothing, genteel Jesus.
We have Jesus going on the offensive creating a public disturbance. We’re not used to seeing Jesus this mad. If Jesus did this kind of thing today, the
authorities would have broken out the tear gas and rubber bullets. So, what do we make of this story?
All four Gospels
include this account of Jesus cleansing the Temple yet only John places it at
the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry.
Matthew, Mark, and Luke place it in the midst of Christ’s final steps to
the cross. It’s most easily understood
that Jesus might lose his cool in his final days before the cross, but here in
John, it’s right after the wedding feast in Cana. In John’s Gospel, we don’t know of anyone at this point who has
argued with or frustrated him. While
John’s placement of this story is not something we’ll dwell on today,[3]
once again in this Gospel, the symbolism assigned to the historical event is
more important than the event itself.[4] So again, what do we make of this
story? What symbolism here is relevant
for us?
If we see the other
side of Jesus in this story then I believe the message to be heard is for the
other side of the church. The other
side of the church? What in the world
am I talking about? Some of you are
probably wondering right now if someone sitting on the other side of the aisle
from you did something this week. Did
someone get in trouble, have it out with the preacher, or get arrested?
What I’m talking about
when I refer to the ‘other side of the church’ is the side of congregational
life where tradition and Gospel sometimes get their wires crossed. It’s where what’s always been done becomes
more acceptable than what the Gospel commands.
I’m talking about that which is common to us all, but may not be as
righteous as we think. I’m also talking
about, when I refer to the ‘other side of the church,’ a message from Jesus
that smacks preachers up side of the head a little harder than the rest of the
Church because we can hold onto tradition much more tightly than anyone.
What Jesus encountered
on this particular day in the Temple is exactly what I’m talking about. If you were a Jewish male, from the age of
twelve on up, you were expected to go to Jerusalem in the latter part of March
or early part of April[5]
to attend the Passover. It was the most
important celebration of Jewish life, which commemorated the deliverance of
Israel from Egyptian bondage.
Part of the celebration
included offering a sacrifice at the Temple.
And since your sacrifice had to be screened and approved before it was
offered, most didn’t bring their own animals.
It was just too risky to tote an animal all that way and then have it
rejected. So most purchased their
pre-approved sacrificial animals once they arrived. And unfortunately for the travelers, it turned into a large
moneymaking scheme for those who were selling the animals because prices were
inflated. For example, a pair of
pigeons worth a nickel might be sold for five bucks! It’s kind of like when you go to a sporting event and you pay
five bucks for a hot dog when you could have brought your own for twenty-five
cents. It’s not worth the hassle to
bring your own hot dog so you just pay it and go on.
And furthermore in the
Temple, since the only currency accepted inside this holy place was Jewish
coin, those who worked at exchanging foreign currency for Jewish currency also
took a healthy cut. So it’s not hard to
see that the Passover celebration, which was supposed to be one of the holiest
moments during the year for Jews, had turned into a moneymaking racket.
Most people just came
to accept that this was the way things were.
After all, what could they do about it?
Not much, so they just acquiesced and went on. But when Jesus arrived on the scene, he didn’t just go with the
flow, he went against the tide! He
challenged what became the accepted practice from a deeply held sense of
conviction.
Can’t you just see
it? Here comes Jesus into the
Temple. He smells the stench, sees the
mess, and observes activity that more closely resembled the livestock sale in
Siler City than a place of worship. And
Jesus goes off! He runs out the
livestock, maybe even those people selling the animals! He also scatters those exchanging money for
Jewish coin. Can’t you just hear the
commotion with venders all running around yelling, “Security! Security!”
Like I said, this is not the Jesus we’re used to meeting in the Gospels. But then maybe this is also a side of church
people we need to see more often – those who are willing to confront and stand
alone even when it’s not popular?
There
was once a missionary who went to another country. As it turns out, the man grew to sincerely love the people in the
village where he served and the people loved him. Once his term of service was up, he decided to stay on, and live
among these folks and continue his work even though he didn’t have to. Being a good and righteous man, he also won
their respect, trust, and love.
Well,
one day the man died unexpectedly.
Because he was not of their faith tradition (he was an evangelical
Protestant in a community of Roman Catholics), the priests of the local
parishes were distraught over where to bury him. You see, to be buried in the local cemetery, you had to be Roman
Catholic – which everyone in this village was.
In order to preserve the integrity of their tradition, the decided to
bury him outside the parish cemetery, but because he was so well-loved, they
decided they would get him as close as possible to being inside. Well, they buried him along the fence that
formed the cemetery perimeter. It
seemed a reasonable compromise. But
during the night following the funeral, a group of people from the parish came
and moved the fence so that this outsider’s grave was now on the inside.[6]
I
wonder how many among us would have moved the fence? How many of us would have just resigned ourselves to say, “Oh
well, that’s the way things are.”
The
Gospel calls us to be a community of fence movers in so many areas: We are to
accept those who are unacceptable. We
are to set the example of living sacrificially in a world that is so
ego-centered that if they can’t see where it benefits them, then they want no
part of it. What fence do you need to
move? Where is Jesus calling you to
step in and tear up the place a little bit even though it might ruffle some
feathers or unsettle the status quo?
Amen.
[1] I also preached on this passage at Cane Creek on
March 23, 2003. This sermon uses some
of the same material.
[2] I’ve adapted the comments in this paragraph from
Robert Z. Bryant’s words in “One Disruptive Lord,” Preaching, March-April
1997, p. 36.
[3] Most biblical scholars feel that historically the
event happened during Passion Week.
[4] Gerhard Sloyan, Interpretation, John (Atlanta:
John Knox Press, 1988), p. 40.
[5] This corresponds to the 10th of the month
in Abib or Nisan.
[6] This illustration came from Robert E. Dunham’s
sermon, “Jesus Word and the Church’s Destruction,” preached on March 2,
1997. He got this illustration from
Lynne Kogel, an acquaintance of his, who heard it from Donald Messer, president
of Ileff Theological Seminary in Denver.