Through The Bible
Session #35 – Luke conclusion; Christmas story study
December 17, 2003
For conclusion on Luke’s overview, see notes from December 3, 2003, Session #34.
As you work through this passage, ask questions of the passage. Be curious. Among the many questions you might ask (in no particular order and remember some of the questions may be more important to pursue than others) are:
Notes on passage:
2:1-2 Emperor Augustus ruled from 27 BC until AD 14. He was the grand nephew of Julius Caesar. We believe that Jesus was born 4-6 BC. Curiously, Quirinius was known to be governor of Syria from 5-6 AD. What do we know about Augustus?
· During his climb to power, he was ruthless. Once there, he mellowed a bit. He was a famous organizer. He respected religious traditions as long as they didn’t interfere with Rome’s laws and traditions.
2:1-2 The registration was a census. This type of activity marked Rome’s domination and sovereignty over Palestine. Think about what was going on here and compare your thoughts with what went on in 2nd Samuel 24. Based on the 2nd Samuel passage, what do you think might have been the reaction and feeling toward census-taking?
· While there wasn’t a direct tax associated with this census, more than likely taxation grew out of the census. In Joseph’s case, up to ½ of his income could have been consumed with Roman taxes.
2:5 Why would Joseph have taken Mary with him when she was so pregnant? Wouldn’t it have been wiser to leave her home? The journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem would have been about 90 miles.
2:7 Babies were swaddled similarly today. One theory was to keep their limb straight.
2:7 Homes
in small towns like Bethlehem, as well as in the city proper, would have
consisted of one room to accommodate the family who lived there. Separating the living quarters from any
animals’ stalls would have been a manger area, where food and farm implements
were stored, and where births often would take place a bit separated from the
ongoing life of the family. Over the
manger area would have been the ‘upper room’ where visiting relatives or
acquaintances, or persons linked to the family by political or economic ties,
could be given hospitality. Joseph,
having returned with his pregnant wife to his ancestral village, would have
anticipated such accommodation (i.e., the upper room) but that didn’t happen.
2:8 Notice
that Luke focuses on shepherds receiving the word of Christ’s birth. Matthew focuses on the Wise men (see Matthew
2:1ff). Why the difference?
· Remember Luke focuses on those who are on the fringes of society and their connection to Jesus.
2:10 Every
time a Caesar was born, or even one of the lesser royal figures, the birth was
announced as good news. People were
compelled to celebrate the event even though it would most likely mean the
continuation of an oppressive system.
Luke uses language that announces a kingly birth, but he says it will be
good news for ALL people. A Savior was
born.
2:10 Note
that the birth of Christ was announced not in Jerusalem’s Temple but on a
farm…out in the field! Again, note
Luke’s focus on those who are on the fringes.
2:12 Compare
the wording here with Isaiah 7:14.
2:13 Encounters
with God should result in praise.
2:15 What
did the shepherds do with the sheep?
2:16 Notice
the “…with haste…” expression. Where
else have you seen this? See Luke 1:39.
2:19 What
do you think all this ‘pondering’ was about?
The word is an old Greek word (sunballousa)
which means to place things or ideas together for comparison.